The Soviet Union was never comfortable
living in the same world with the Vatican. The most recent disclosures
document that the Kremlin was prepared to go to any lengths to counter the
Catholic Church’s strong anti-Communism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2006 an Italian parliamentary commission concluded “beyond any reasonable doubt that the
leaders of the Soviet Union took the initiative to eliminate the pope Karol
Wojtyla,” in retaliation for his support to the dissident Solidarity movement
in Poland. In January 2007, when documents disclosed that the newly appointed
archbishop of Warsaw, Stanislaw Wielgus, had collaborated with Poland’s Communist-era political police, he admitted the accusation and resigned. The following day the rector of Krakow’s Wawel Cathedral, the burial site of Polish kings and queens, resigned for the same
reason. Then it was learned that Michal Jagosz, a member of the Vatican’s
tribunal considering sainthood for the late Pope John Paul II, has been
accused of being a former Communist secret police agent; according to the Polish media, he had been
recruited in 1984 before leaving Poland for an assignment to the Vatican.
Currently, a book is about to be published that will identify 39 other
priests whose names have been found in Krakow secret police files, some of
whom are now bishops. Moreover, this seems to be just scratching the surface.
A special commission will soon start investigating the past of all religious
servants during the Communist era, as thousands more Catholic priests
throughout that country are believed to have collaborated with the secret
police. And this is just Poland — the archives of the KGB and those of the
political police in the rest of the former Soviet bloc have yet to be opened
on the subject of operations against the Vatican.
In my other life, when I was at the center of Moscow’s foreign-intelligence
wars, I myself was caught up in a deliberate Kremlin effort to smear the
Vatican, by portraying Pope Pius XII as a coldhearted Nazi sympathizer. Ultimately,
the operation did not cause any lasting damage, but it left a residual bad
taste that is hard to rinse away. The story has never before been told.
BATTLING THE CHURCH
In February 1960, Nikita Khrushchev approved a super-secret plan for
destroying the Vatican’s moral authority in Western Europe. The idea was the
brainchild of KGB chairman Aleksandr Shelepin and Aleksey Kirichenko, the
Soviet Politburo member responsible for international policies. Up until that
time, the KGB had fought its “mortal enemy” in Eastern Europe, where the Holy
See had been crudely attacked as a cesspool of espionage in the pay of
American imperialism, and its representatives had been summarily jailed as
spies. Now Moscow wanted the Vatican discredited by its own priests, on its
home territory, as a bastion of Nazism.
Eugenio Pacelli, by then Pope Pius XII, was selected as the KGB’s main
target, its incarnation of evil, because he had departed this world in 1958.
“Dead men cannot defend themselves” was the KGB’s latest slogan. Moscow had
just gotten a black eye for framing and imprisoning a living Vatican prelate,
József Cardinal Mindszenty, the primate of Hungary, in 1948. During the 1956
Hungarian Revolution he had escaped from jail and found asylum in the U.S. Embassy in Budapest, where he began writing his memoirs. As the details of how he had been
framed became known to Western journalists, he was widely seen as a saintly
hero and martyr.
Because Pius XII had served as the papal nuncio in Munich and Berlin when the Nazis were beginning their bid for power, the KGB wanted to depict him as
an anti-Semite who had encouraged Hitler’s Holocaust. The hitch was that the
operation was not to give the least hint of Soviet bloc involvement. The
whole dirty job had to be carried out by Western hands, using evidence from
the Vatican itself. That would correct another mistake made in the case of
Mindszenty, who had been framed with counterfeit Soviet and Hungarian
documents. (On February 6, 1949, just days before Mindszenty’s trial ended,
Hanna Sulner, the Hungarian handwriting expert who had fabricated the
“evidence” used to frame the cardinal, escaped to Vienna and displayed
microfilms of the “documents” on which the show trial was founded. Hanna
demonstrated, in an excruciatingly detailed testimony, that all were forged
documents, “some ostensibly in the cardinal’s hand, others bearing his
supposed signature,” produced by her.)
To avoid another Mindszenty catastrophe, the KGB needed some original Vatican documents, even ones only remotely connected with Pius XII, which its dezinformatsiya
experts could slightly modify and project in the “proper light” to prove
the Pope’s “true colors.” The difficulty was that the KGB had no access to
the Vatican archives, and that was where my DIE, the Romanian foreign
intelligence service, came in. The new chief of the Soviet foreign
intelligence service, General Aleksandr Sakharovsky, had created the DIE in
1949 and had until recently been our chief Soviet adviser; he knew that the
DIE was in an excellent position to contact the Vatican and obtain approval
to search its archives. In 1959, when I had been assigned to West Germany in
the cover position as deputy chief of the Romanian Mission, I had conducted a
“spy swap” under which two DIE officers (Colonel Gheorghe Horobet and Major
Nicolae Ciuciulin), who had been caught red-handed in West Germany, had been
exchanged for Roman Catholic bishop Augustin Pacha, who had been jailed by
the KGB on a spurious charge of espionage and was finally returned to the
Vatican via West Germany.
INFILTRATING THE VATICAN
“Seat-12” was the code name given to this operation against Pius XII, and I
became its Romanian point man. To facilitate my job, Sakharovsky had
authorized me to (falsely) inform the Vatican that Romania was ready to
restore its broken relations with the Holy See, in exchange for access to its
archives and a one-billion-dollar, interest-free loan for 25 years. (Romania’s
relations with the Vatican had been severed in 1951, when Moscow accused the Vatican’s nunciatura in Romania of being an undercover CIA front and closed its offices. The nunciatura
buildings in Bucharest had been turned over to the DIE, and now housed a
foreign language school.) The access to the Papal archives, I was to tell the
Vatican, was needed in order to find historical roots that would help the
Romanian government publicly justify its change of heart toward the Holy See.
The billion (no, that is not a typographical error), I was told, had been
introduced into the game to make Romania’s alleged turnabout more plausible. “If
there’s one thing those monks understand, it’s money,” Sakharovsky remarked.
My earlier involvement in the exchange of Bishop Pacha for the two DIE
officers did indeed open doors for me. A month after receiving the KGB’s
instructions, I had my first contact with a Vatican representative. For
secrecy reasons that meeting — and most of the ones that followed — took
place at a hotel in Geneva, Switzerland. There I was introduced to an
“influential member of the diplomatic corps” who, I was told, had begun his
career working in the Vatican archives. His name was Agostino Casaroli, and I
would soon learn that he was truly influential. On the spot this monsignor
gave me access to the Vatican archives, and soon three young DIE undercover
officers posing as Romanian priests were digging around in the papal
archives. Casaroli also agreed “in principle” to Bucharest’s demand for the
interest free loan, but he said the Vatican wished to place certain
conditions on it. (Up until 1978, when I left Romania for good, I was still
negotiating for that loan, which had gone down to $200 million.)
During 1960-62, the DIE succeeded in pilfering hundreds of documents
connected in any way with Pope Pius XII out of the Vatican Archives and the
Apostolic Library. Everything was immediately sent to the KGB via special
courier. In actual fact, no incriminating material against the pontiff ever
turned up in all those secretly photographed documents. Mostly they were
copies of personal letters and transcripts of meetings and speeches, all
couched in the routine kind of diplomatic language one would expect to find.
Nevertheless, the KGB kept asking for more documents. And we sent more.
THE KGB PRODUCES A PLAY
In 1963, General Ivan Agayants, the famous chief of the KGB’s disinformation
department, landed in Bucharest to thank us for our help. He told us that
“Seat-12” had materialized into a powerful play attacking Pope Pius XII,
entitled The Deputy, an oblique reference to the pope as Christ’s
representative on earth. Agayants took credit for the outline of the play,
and he told us that it had voluminous appendices of background documents
put together by his experts with help from the documents we had purloined
from the Vatican. Agayants also told us that The Deputy’s producer,
Erwin Piscator, was a devoted Communist who had a longstanding relationship
with Moscow. In 1929 he had founded the Proletarian Theater in Berlin, then sought political asylum in the Soviet Union when Hitler came to power, and a
few years later had “emigrated” to the United States. In 1962 Piscator had
returned to West Berlin to produce The Deputy.
Throughout my years in Romania, I always took my KGB bosses with a grain of
salt, because they used to juggle the facts around so as to make Soviet
intelligence the mother and father of everything. But I had reason to believe
Agayants’s self-serving claim. He was a living legend in the field of desinformatsiya.
In 1943, as the rezident in Iran, Agayants launched the disinformation
report that Hitler had set up a special team to kidnap President Franklin
Roosevelt from the American Embassy in Tehran during the Allied Summit to be held there. As a result, Roosevelt agreed to be headquartered in a villa
within the “safety” of the Soviet Embassy compound, which was guarded by a
large military unit. All the Soviet personnel assigned to that villa were
undercover intelligence officers who spoke English, but, with few exceptions,
they kept that a secret so as to be able to eavesdrop. Even given the limited
technical capabilities of that day, Agayants was able to provide Stalin with
hourly monitoring reports on the American and British guests. That helped
Stalin obtain Roosevelt’s tacit agreement to let him retain the Baltic
countries and the rest of the territories occupied by the Soviet Union in
1939-40. Agayants was also credited with having induced Roosevelt to use the
familiar “Uncle Joe” for Stalin at that summit. According to what Sakharovsky
told us, Stalin was more elated over that than he was even over his
territorial gains. “The cripple’s mine!” he reportedly exulted.
Just a year before The Deputy was launched, Agayants had pulled off
another masterful coup. He fabricated out of whole cloth a manuscript
designed to persuade the West that, deep down, the Kremlin thought highly of
the Jews; this was published in Western Europe, to great popular success, as
a book entitled Notes for a Journal. The manuscript was attributed to
Maxim Litvinov, né Meir Walach, the former Soviet commissar for foreign
affairs, who had been fired in 1939 when Stalin purged his diplomatic
apparatus of Jews in preparation for signing his “non-aggression” pact with Hitler. (The
Stalin-Hitler Non-Aggression Pact was signed on August 23, 1939, in Moscow. It had a secret Protocol that partitioned Poland between the two signatories and
gave the Soviets a free hand in Estonia, Latvia, Finland, Bessarabia, and Northern Bukovina.) This
Agayants book was so flawlessly counterfeited that Britain’s most prominent
historian on Soviet Russia, Edward Hallet Carr, was totally convinced of its
authenticity and in fact wrote an introduction for it. (Carr had authored a
ten-volume History of Soviet Russia.)
The Deputy saw the light in 1963 as the work of an unknown West German
named Rolf Hochhuth, under the title Der Stellvertreter. Ein christliches
Trauerspiel (The Deputy, a Christian Tragedy). Its central thesis was
that Pius XII had supported Hitler and encouraged him to go ahead with the
Jewish Holocaust. It immediately ignited a huge controversy around Pius XII,
who was depicted as a cold, heartless man more concerned about Vatican properties than about the fate of Hitler’s victims. The original text presents an
eight-hour play, backed by some 40 to 80 pages (depending on the edition) of
what Hochhuth called “historical documentation.” In a newspaper article
published in Germany in 1963, Hochhuth defends his portrayal of Pius XII,
saying: “The facts are there — forty crowded pages of documentation in the
appendix to my play.” In a radio interview given in New York in 1964, when The
Deputy opened there, Hochhuth said, “I considered it necessary to add to
the play a historical appendix, fifty to eighty pages (depending on the size
of the print).” In the original edition, the appendix is entitled “Historische
Streiflichter” (historical sidelights). The Deputy has been
translated into some 20 languages, drastically cut and with the appendix usually
omitted.
Before writing The Deputy, Hochhuth, who did not have a high school
diploma (Abitur), was working in various inconspicuous capacities for
the Bertelsmann publishing house. In interviews he claimed that in 1959 he
took a leave of absence from his job and went to Rome, where he spent three
months talking to people and then writing the first draft of the play, and
where he posed “a series of questions” to one bishop whose name he refused to
reveal. Hardly likely! At about that same time I used to visit the Vatican
fairly regularly as an accredited messenger from a head of state, and I was
never able to get any talkative bishop off into a corner with me — and it was
not for lack of trying. The DIE illegal officers we infiltrated into the Vatican also encountered almost insurmountable difficulties in penetrating the Vatican secret
archives, even though they had airtight cover as priests.
During my old days in the DIE, when I would ask my personnel chief, General
Nicolae Ceausescu (the dictator’s brother), to give me a rundown of the file
on some subordinate, he would always ask me, “For promotion or demotion?”
During its first ten years of life, the Deputy leaned toward the
Pope’s demotion. It generated a flurry of books and articles, some accusing and
some defending the pontiff. Some went so far as to lay the blame for the
Auschwitz atrocities on the pope’s shoulders, some meticulously tore
Hochhuth’s arguments to shreds, but all contributed to the huge attention
this rather stilted play received in its day. Today, many people who have never heard
of The Deputy are sincerely convinced that Pius XII was a cold and
evil man who hated the Jews and helped Hitler do away with them. As KGB
chairman Yury Andropov, the unparalleled master of Soviet deception, used to
tell me, people are more ready to believe smut than holiness.
FALSEHOODS UNDERMINED
Toward the mid 1970s, The Deputy started running out of steam. In 1974
Andropov conceded to us that, had we known then what we know today, we would
never have gone after Pope Pius XII. What now made the difference was newly
released information showing that Hitler, far from being friendly with Pius
XII, had in fact been plotting against him.
Just a few days before Andropov’s admission, the former supreme commander of
the German SS (Schutzstaffel) squadron in Italy during World War II,
General Friedrich Otto Wolff, had been released from jail and confessed that
in 1943 Hitler had ordered him to abduct Pope Pius XII from the Vatican. That
order had been so hush-hush that it never turned up after the war in any Nazi
archive. Nor had it come out at any of the many debriefings of Gestapo
and SS officers conducted by the victorious Allies. In his confession Wolff
claimed that he had replied to Hitler that his order would take six weeks to
carry out. Hitler, who blamed the pope for the overthrow of Italian dictator
Benito Mussolini, wanted it done immediately. Eventually Wolff persuaded
Hitler that there would be a great negative response if the plan were
implemented, and the Führer dropped it.
It was also during 1974 that Cardinal Mindszenty published his book Memoirs,
which describes in agonizing detail how he was framed in Communist Hungary. On the evidence of fabricated documents, he was charged with “treason, misuse of
foreign currency, and conspiracy,” offenses “all punishable by death or life
imprisonment.” He also describes how his falsified “confession” then took on
a life of its own. “It seemed to me that anyone should at once have
recognized this document as a crude forgery, since it is the product of a
bungling, uncultivated mind,” the cardinal writes. “But when I subsequently
went through foreign books, newspapers, and magazines that dealt with my case
and commented on my ‘confession,’ I realized that the public must have
concluded that the ‘confession’ had actually been composed by me, although in
a semiconscious state and under the influence of brainwashing… [T]hat the
police would have published a document they had themselves manufactured
seemed altogether too brazen to be believed.” Furthermore, Hanna Sulner,
the Hungarian handwriting expert used to frame the cardinal, who had escaped
to Vienna, confirmed that she had forged Mindszenty’s “confession.”
A few years later, Pope John Paul II started the process of sanctifying Pius
XII, and witnesses from all over the world have compellingly proved that Pius
XII was an enemy, not a friend, of Hitler. Israel Zoller, the chief rabbi of Rome between 1943-44, when Hitler took over that city, devoted an entire chapter of his
memoirs to praising the leadership of Pius XII. “The Holy Father sent by hand
a letter to the bishops instructing them to lift the enclosure from convents
and monasteries, so that they could become refuges for the Jews. I know of
one convent where the Sisters slept in the basement, giving up their beds to
Jewish refugees.” On July 25, 1944, Zoller was received by Pope Pius XII.
Notes taken by Vatican secretary of state Giovanni Battista Montini (who
would become Pope Paul VI) show that Rabbi Zoller thanked the Holy Father for
all he had done to save the Jewish community of Rome — and his thanks were
transmitted over the radio. On February 13, 1945, Rabbi Zoller was baptized
by Rome’s auxiliary bishop Luigi Traglia in the Church of Santa Maria degli Angeli. In gratitude to Pius XII, Zoller took the Christian name of Eugenio
(the pope’s name). A year later Zoller’s wife and daughter were also
baptized.
David G. Dalin, in The Myth of Hitler’s Pope: How Pope
Pius XII Rescued Jews From the Nazis, published a few months
ago, has compiled further overwhelming proof of Eugenio Pacelli’s friendship
for the Jews beginning long before he became pope. At the start of World War II,
Pope Pius XII’s first encyclical was so anti-Hitler that the Royal Air Force
and the French air force dropped 88,000 copies of it over Germany.
Over the past 16 years, the freedom of religion has been restored in Russia, and a new generation has been struggling to develop a new national identity. We can
only hope that President Vladimir Putin will see fit to open the KGB archives
and set forth on the table, for all to see, how the Communists maligned one
of the most important popes of the last century.
—Lt. General Ion Mihai Pacepa is the highest-ranking intelligence officer
ever to have defected from the former Soviet bloc. His book Red Horizons has been
republished in 27 countries.
|
